Credit markets iced over. Put your head between your knees.

This is still a Goldilocks economy?

Many standard fear gauges remain near their most elevated levels of the bust so far. From highly emotional conditions like these, we should expect a big move in equity prices. The question is whether the next emotion is relief or all-out panic.

If the fundamentals were not so horrible and stock prices not so high (with earnings falling off a cliff, real PEs are in the stratosphere and dividend yields are pathetic), this would be a promising time to go long, at least for a trade. As is, that would be Russian Roulette, because it would be hard to imagine a market more primed to absolutely crash than this one.

With open talk of a depression from the Secretary of the Treasury, and the President comparing the financial system to a “house of cards,” the Dow Jones Industrial Average registers the same opinion about the economy as it did in mid-2006, when talk of Goldilocks was in the air. Something has to give.

This is the Dow from summer 1982 to the present. We are still at the crest of the tidal wave:

Click image for larger view. Source: Yahoo! Finance.

Last week (Sept 15th-19th) a huge amount of steam was let out out of the market, first from the bears, and then from the bulls. By Friday afternoon, traders expressed physical and emotional exhaustion, and volume dried up. It was an eerie feeling.

That week started off in a fright, with new lows on the Dow, T-bills under 0.1% and a VIX over 40. In a lesser bear market, Thursday’s bailout announcement should have marked a substantial bottom (by no means the bottom, but at least the basis for a tradeable rally).

However, the 1000 point, three-hour rally from 2:30PM on Thursday to 11:00AM on Friday hardly set up the basis for a sustained rise, since where else could stocks go but down after such a move? The very violence of it showed how much fear was out there by Thursday morning. We were truly looking into the abyss, that netherworld below 10,000.

After the short-squeeze ran out of steam, prices dribbled down from Friday afternoon to this Wednesday on low volume and volatility, before a little follow-up rally Thursday and Friday relieved the very-near-term oversold condition.  The Dow rests this weekend at 11,143, awaiting what will surely be a wise edict from the philosophers in our legislature. 11,143 is a number neither too ugly sounding nor too pollyannaish, square in the middle, with plenty of room on either side (at least for the near-term).

10-day view here (double lines mark the days):

Click image for larger view. Source: Bigcharts.com

Fear is still highly elevated, no doubt stoked among the general public by the scare tactics and demeanor of Messrs. Bernanke and Paulson. Over the last week, even people who did not support Ron Paul for president have begun to acknowledge the magnitude of the problem. The question is, what are they going to to about it, and when?

To see where Mr. Market’s next move is coming from, follow his rates, not his stocks.

The credit market isn’t waiting for anyone, public nor Paulson. As far as banks are concerned, it’s already TEOTWAWKI, and that is important because changes in credit markets precede changes in equity markets. Two summers ago, while Goldilocks was still enjoying her porridge, bond traders were looking out the window and deciding to pay a premium for long-term debt over short-term (an inverted yield curve is almost always followed 12-18 months later by a recession).

Short-term Treasury yields of course are extremely compressed. 3-month T-bill yield here:

Click image for larger view. Source: Yahoo! Finance

Here is the TED spread, the difference between LIBOR (the rate that banks outside the US Fed system lend one another overnight) and 90 day Treasuries. A wide spread indicates reluctance to lend, i.e., a lack of trust between banks.

Click image for larger view. Source: Bloomberg

Here’s another scary picture from the credit markets, the discount rate spread, the difference in yield between AA and A2/P2 rated commercial paper (short-term corporate debt such as trade receivables). This is why non-Treasury money market funds are so risky (and why Paulson wants to bail them out):

Click image for larger view. Source: Federal Reserve

Fear bloodhounds should also be trained on the Chicago Board of Exchange Volatility Index, a measure of expected volatility in the S&P 500, as indicated by near-term options prices. From summer 2006 to summer 2007, the VIX dipped under 10 at times, truly the calm before the storm, registering the very apex of the decades of unfounded optimism and imprudence that brought about this mess. During the dot-com bust, it nudged over 40 on occasion, a number that was breached intraday in the pre-bailout depths of last Thursday. Two-year view here:

Click image for larger view. Source: Yahoo! Finance

This bear is scared to hell of Goldilocks. It’s too dangerous out there to even short with the confidence that you can get paid if you are right. Where will the money come from?

Please see disclaimer.

About these ads

4 thoughts on “Credit markets iced over. Put your head between your knees.

  1. Only weeks ago, shorting seemed like a good idea. Now, due to systemic/counter-party risks, it seems too crazy to contemplate. When do T-Bills suffer the same fate? Is government default 2 years away, or is it racing towards us faster than anyone might have imagined? I don’t even like posing this question.

  2. I am reading up on the Options Clearing Corporation, looking for clues as to what it would take to bankrupt the clearing house. A wipe-out of customer margin, yes, and those customers’ inability to make their margin calls, and then a wipe-out of their brokers’ reserves. But what about the reserves of the OCC itself? The system handled the 1987 crash (22% in 1 day), but the banking system was not on the ropes at the time so firms were able to cough up the dough to cover clients’ bankruptcies.

    Everyone talks about the need for a clearing house for OTC derivatives, but with a situation like this, you have to consider the house going broke.

    As for T-bills, I assume the Fed will always step in and buy them if nobody else will, so the Treasury will be able to fund the US government (unfortunately). An outright honest (“sorry, we can’t pay”) default is unlikely, IMHO. Inflation has always been the outcome when a government’s debt is in its own currency.

  3. Pingback: Can I Have Another Piece of Chocolate Cake? | MAS o Menos

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s