Time to sell TBT and buy TLT.

The Treasury double short fund TBT has had a great run since New Year’s, when the long bond yielded just 2.5%, the lowest level since the WW2 era. I suspect that a lot of readers were with me on my bond short back then, as most bearish-minded folk had been chomping at the bit to short Treasuries (or had already been short while they ran up from summer 2008).

Now I think it’s time to think about buying this horribly overvalued security again simply because it is so universally hated.

Of course confidence was up in May

Since they both reflect prevailing social mood, the stock market and consumer confidence move together. Today’s CC figure (about as high as last summer), is another sign that the investing public’s opinion of our economic prospects is overly optimistic:

If this were a stock chart of a company with horrible fundamentals (a prospective short), I would wait a bit longer to see if it kissed the 2002-2003 bottom before going heavily short, though I might start to establish a position at these levels.

What is striking about this 9-year view is how closely CC tracks the stock market, and how much more lackluster the mood was in the dead-cat bounce from 2003-2007 than the true secular peak in the late 1990s to 2000.

Most of the way there.

The bounce has been faster and more comprehensive than I expected. I was thinking that we would top around these levels, but by summer or fall, not early May. I have continued to scale into distant-expiry SPY and QQQQ puts, favoring ITM and ATM, and have now deployed about 1/3 of the money I am willing to allocate to shorts. I also have a smidgen of shorter-term positions in certain ridiculously high-flying restaurant and other consumer stocks.

The bond sell-off and commodities rally indicate that inflation fears now have the upper hand, as most people still believe deflation will be a short-lived phenomenon. The aforementioned movements are setting up nicely for long and short replays, respectively.

Notwithstanding a long-overdue correction, I suspect that stocks have further to run, and am no longer such a skeptic of certain Elliott wavers’ target of S&P 1050. Bullishness is now at 80%, up from 2% in March, but judging from attitudes on TV, there is still a great deal of skepticism to be overcome before we can call a top. That said, the speed and evenness of the advance leads me to expect much more choppiness for the remainder.

Shorting precious metals has been frustrating, and I suspect that we are repeating the pattern of last spring, when we had to work our way through several months of chop after receding from manic levels (1030 gold that time, vs 1007 in February).

It is important to keep in mind the real situation, not just the current market mood (though you can’t trade on fundamentals alone). We can’t work off the greatest credit bubble in history in 18 months and just a 57% loss in the stock market. The real (private, productive) economy is not going to stop shedding jobs, let alone add them, for years, and people are so indebted that they cannot be enticed to reflate the asset bubble or return to previous levels of wasteful spending. It will take a generation to work through our debt and lifestyle delusions.

It bears repeating that today’s official headline unemployment number (8.9%) cannot be compared to numbers from before the 1990s, when the Clinton administration changed the reporting methodology to exclude large segments of unemployed. A more useful measure for historical comparisons is U-6 unemployment, which now stands at 15.8% for April. Today on Bloomberg I heard Christina Romer say that things were nothing like the Great Depression, as she compared apples to oranges. In reality, we are at solidly depressionary levels already.

Also bear in mind that stock valuations remain at bubble levels. This is easy to see when you remember that stocks have no intrinsic value other than marked to market book value and heavily discounted future earnings. The major indexes’ trailing PE’s on net earnings will be under 10 by the time this is over. We still need to work off the bubble that was blown in the 1990s, which didn’t finish deflating in 2003 because of the easing of credit. Every kind of credit is tightening now, unless of course you are a bank holding company.

Mish takes Peter Schiff to the cleaners

Mish has composed a detailed post on the many ways in which the vociferous Peter Schiff has been dead wrong on just about everything in this crash (the two actually had a little debate in December 2007). Mish’s post is essential reading for anyone who is considering following Schiff’s investment advice. In his own way, the man is usually just as wrong as the Pollyannas that he challenges on bubblevision.

Here is an excerpt:

Schiff’s Investment Thesis

  • US Dollar Will Go To Zero (Hyperinflation).
  • Decoupling (The rest of the world would be immune to a US slowdown.
  • Buy foreign equities and commodities and hold them with no exit strategy.


12 Ways Schiff Was Wrong in 2008

  • Wrong about hyperinflation
  • Wrong about the dollar
  • Wrong about commodities except for gold
  • Wrong about foreign currencies except for the Yen
  • Wrong about foreign equities
  • Wrong in timing
  • Wrong in risk management
  • Wrong in buy and hold thesis
  • Wrong on decoupling
  • Wrong on China
  • Wrong on US treasuries
  • Wrong on interest rates, both foreign and domestic

That’s a lot of things to be wrong about, especially given all the “Peter Schiff Was Right” videos floating around everywhere. The one thing he was right about was the collapse of US equities and no part of his investment strategy sought to make a gain from that prediction.

I will admit that I was nearly taken in by Schiff’s thesis back in 2006 when I first became bearish on the economy and stock market. I even opened an account for someone with his firm, but the only thing I did with it was short the US market — I took none of his brokers’ advice on favored mining juniors.

I owe Mish and Robert Prechter a huge debt of gratitude for beating some sense into me with solid logic. Readers can easily check my archives to see my pre-crash stances on commodities, gold stocks, Treasuries, the dollar, the Swiss Franc and the Euro and the inflation/deflation debate. I can report that things have turned out very well for those who went against the crowd of contrarians, swallowed their fear of the dollar, and shorted not just US stocks but almost everything else in sight. All the world was a bubble.

On the need to stay nimble

Yes, the deflationists were right and hopefully all made some money or at least avoided terrible losses, but nobody can afford to get cocky. The markets do not trade on fundamentals on anything but the longest time-frames, so the ability to read the prevailing mood and adjust accordingly is a critical part of asset management. So is the willingness to contradict yourself and change your mind.

I see now that this deflation can last even longer than I had suspected, and that there may be even ways to avoid hyperinflation, such as negotiated Treasury debt forgiveness, but there is no need to try to guess about outcomes that are years away when you know how to read the signs as they come and remain humble and liquid enough to change your stance as needed.

By the way, Mish manages client accounts

Mish is an investment advisor representative with Sitka Pacific (not Euro Pacific!), a firm that manages private accounts on a percent of assets fee basis. I am not a client, but I would not hesitate to suggest giving them a call. I am working on setting up my own firm of this type, which offers many advantages over hedge or mutual funds, especially when set up with the protections that Sitka Pacific has included. My own style of trading is somewhat different from any of the strategies Mish uses (for example, I am willing to go net short or to a majority cash position), and of course I am not always in agreement with Mish on every aspect of the markets.

Still bearish on the yellow metal

As many readers know, I have been bearish on gold lately. I have been buying puts on GLD and GDX and bought more yesterday, though I do have a big chunk of assets in bullion (20x more than in puts). My bullion is not for sale, but I suspect that the reality of deflation and its likely duration has yet to fully sink in, and that we are due for a demoralizing event in the gold market.

Gold is not fully treated as money at the moment, though fiat currencies don’t satisfy all of the criteria for money either. Only precious metals can fully satisfy them, when governments allow.

So gold is not really money now, since its liquidity is limited, but it is a long-term store of value that outlasts currencies and governments. This is the key point: from the perspective of a large player who can afford warehouse costs, other metals or commodities can also serve as a store of value and hedge against fiscal calamity. Copper and cotton and rice will never go to zero either.

Almost all other commodities are down by huge percentages, though gold hangs on. It makes sense for gold to outperform the others, since it is more liquid and portable and people naturally prefer it during a crisis, but the premium seems way too high.

Once this panic phase of the depression is over, and a general funk and low-velocity environment settles in, with the dollar and other currencies having survived to the surprise of so many gold owners, the metal could be again seen as dead weight and fall as people still need plain old folding money to pay their bills, debts and taxes.

That is how I see things. Only time will tell if I am right.

Fear recedes, so how will it return?

The markets are experiencing a bit of a thaw today, with the memory of panic several weeks behind us now. The VIX has just broken decisively below 40 for the first time since September. Treasury yields have broken out just a tad from their extreme lows. Oil has jumped back to the mid-40s, copper has relieved its oversold condition, the GDX gold stock ETF has more than doubled, and the Dow has crept back to near 9000 again.

The question now remains, how will fear return? In several more weeks or months after the mood turns from relief to greed (and fear of missing out), or in the very near future?

My mind is not made up, but any breakaway rally is way overdue. With every week since the November 21 lows, we have been relieving the oversold condition as a function of time rather than price. That is not to say that the Dow couldn’t creep all the way to 10,000 by March, but the longer we hover here, the less necessary such a rally becomes.

What would be interesting in a January plunge is for the bond market to sell off with the stock market for the first time in recent events. But if the inverse correlation still holds, the overbought condition in Treasuries could find relief in a “happy days are not quite here again but will be soon” rally in stocks. Today’s action is what such an environment would look like, but with a great deal more animal spirits — $65 oil might even materialize (before new lows of course).

At any event, with the VIX below 38 I picked up a few more cheap puts on GDX today. Gold stocks have had a great run, and the same people are buying them today as were holding them in the crash, and for the same reasons. That is a bad sign.

My favorite short though is still the death-defying Home Depot. Also keep an eye on WalMart. People need cheap stuff, but they don’t need as much of it as they have been buying in recent years. At 16.5, the PE on that behemoth is still out of line, as is Costco’s at 18.5.

—-

PS — Note that in this kind of analysis, I don’t pay much attention to news pieces or economic releases. That is not the way to trade. For instance, we have horrible manufacturing data out today, and all data is worse than 6 weeks ago, but the mood is hopeful and stocks are up, so how can you make money trading on the news?

I look at the mood of the market itself and try to figure out what it is feeling and what themes it is trading on: greed, panic, relief, inflation, deflation, dollar bad, dollar good, etc. I try to figure out the mood by what different asset prices are doing, and wait for entry and exit points when trends look exhaused. To know the larger trend is key, in this case deflation and depression, but the market’s take on the situation is always changing. You wait for Mr. Market to be very wrong about a situation or just too enthusiastic, as in the case of the overextended bond rally this month — in deflation, bonds are good, but overbought is overbought.

Finally, time to short the long bond (for a trade).

Here’s a two-year view of my proxy for the US 30-year Treasury bond, TLT:

Source: Yahoo! Finance. Click to enlarge.

It seems as though the mother of all Treasury rallies has run out of steam for now. I’m stepping in to play a possible correction, with a target exit range of 100-105 on TLT, corresponding to about 3.5 – 4.0% yields.

I also expect the dollar to regain lost ground at the same time, and for the Euro and Swiss franc to retrace the gains of the last three weeks.

Gold should also fall in such a scenario, as it’s price in Euros and Francs has barely changed since departing the 750 dollar level.

Whether or not to short the long bond has been the most consistent question posed by friends. I have advised against it until now, having called for sub-3% yields as early as last August. I still think this topping process needs at least another year to play out, but when nearly everyone is on one side of a trade, it is time to take the other. Simple as that.

Shorts have been burned all the way from 5.5%, and most have now given up in frustration. The news that the Fed will start buying is the perfect cherry of bullish fundamental news to complement a market top. What more could you ask? With every schmuck of a money-losing manager finally talking up bonds on Bloomberg, who else is yet to come on board?

I’m an options guy, but another way to play, besides futures, is to simply buy TBT, an ultrashort ETF.

Why do I think that yields will stay this low for over a year? Because this is the top of a 28-year bull market, and we’ve only been under 3% for a few weeks. At the last Treasury top, the 1940s, yields held under 3% for nearly a decade, even as inflation hit 10%. Market prices don’t have to make sense, in any sense other than as a reflection of mass psychology.

Disclaimer: Don’t trade like me. Don’t trade at all. It’s too dangerous out there, and this is very risky stuff, especially shorting in anticipation of a countertrend move.

What a close. Down 473 points in 15 minutes.

I have built up a position in DIA Nov. 08 puts on rallies over the past couple of weeks, and with the Dow up 300 at 3:30 today, I couldn’t resist adding a few more than I would ordinarily be comfortable with. I intended to part with the extra contracts maybe tomorrow or the next day in the inevitable correction after such an awesome rally (1,208 points, 14.8%). As it turned out, the Dow proceeded to drop 473 points in about 15 minutes, and I unloaded the contracts at the close for the fastest money I’ve ever made (as regular readers know, I’m more fond of buying LEAPs to capture the big, multi-month moves).

From Bigcharts.com, here’s the 1-day chart (1 minute):

Click image for sharper view.

As I count the Elliott Waves, this pattern has the A-B-C shape characteristic of a countertrend move, so it doesn’t change my expectation for new index lows in the coming days or couple of weeks. The mini-crash at the close looks like waves 1, 2, 3 and 4 of an impulse wave, which would resolve with another drop below the wave 4 low near the open tomorrow. Impulse waves move in the direction of the one-larger degree trend, as opposed to A-B-C moves.

Today’s chart also illustrates another textbook pattern: the contracting zig-zag from 2:40 to 3:15 resolved in the direction of the previous trend — up, way up. The 1-month pattern is still a very large contracting zig-zag, which, should it stay true to form, would resolve downwards, perhaps to Dow 7000, though a push above the October 14th high first is also possible:

Click for sharper view.

All of this near-term wave counting and trading is really just a hobby for me. I don’t use big money in it, but just enough to keep my attention so that I learn something. My real money is in T-bills, gold and still a boatload of 2010 puts that I accumulated over the last 15 months (see disclaimer), though I have been paring that position in the crash. If I hadn’t been selling, it would be about 85% of my portfolio by now.

Sorry for the paucity of posts lately. I’m in the middle of a trans-oceanic move, ditching a ridiculous Latin American country for a central European one known for staying sane while the rest of the world goes nuts.

Bailout deal? Whoop de do.

Well, there you have it. Paulson got his 700 big ones (to start) but Congress is going to make him ask again for some of it (like they’ll say no). Executive compensation cuts? Well, deduction caps and no new golden parachutes for the biggest beggars. Equity? Well, warrants, and Paulson gets to say how many, what price, etc. Majority stakes only in some circumstances. Boy, Congress really fought this thing once it learned how its constituents felt.

Futures traders are just beside themselves (with apathy):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Bloomberg

So, where do we go from here? As I have been saying, we still have a crash to take care of. Maybe it starts this week, maybe next week, maybe December, but a year from now the buy and hold crowd will be lucky if the Dow is closer to 10,000 than 5,000. This bill won’t do a thing to stimulate lending. We are just turning Japanese, without the exports or savings.

As a short, I won’t look this gift horse in the mouth. Paulson bought his buddies time to unload the remainder their personal securities, but the bailout also adds a few girders to bolster counterparties on the losing side of a crash. My biggest fear these days is that so many securities dealers could go broke at once that the Options Clearing Corporation can’t make up for bankrupt put sellers. That is my version of TEOTWAWKI.

So, are there no libertarians in financial crises? I railed against this thing, but the bankers make the rules in this new zero-sum game, or rather negative-sum game (wealth is going to money heaven). For those who stay in, it is every trader for himself.

Here’s a pdf of the full draft of the bill at it stands tonight.

SEC intends to ban short selling. Government boxcars reported in Greenwich.

Hedge fund managers said to pack dirt under fingernails, roughen hands on bricks to avoid suspicion and possible shipment to North Dakota re-education camps.

These days it seems like we are living in an Onion article (1 , 2). It would be funny if it were not the end of the world as we know it.

I’ve been a bear since spring of 2006, preparing for a depression since early 2007, and have had no illusions about the death of the idea that was America. I saw these events coming a mile away, but the speed with which they have arrived is shocking.

By edict of the Duma…

I figured that the shorting ban (WSJ article) would pop up somewhere near the midpoint of the bear market, maybe Dow 8000, but this train to Animal Farm is an express. When will they ban international money transfers? Unapproved foreign travel? Gold?

The speed with which our leaders are dropping any pretense of respect for markets just makes me that much more bearish. 8000 could be next month, not next year as I had figured. And I have to rethink my bottom target of 3500. Really, that would not be the end of the world — this market started at 800 back in 1982, and you have to remember that equity values go POOF after an economy gets as leveraged as ours is. 75% stock market drops are not black swans. They follow credit bubbles like day follows night.

Markets are so bourgeois, anyway.

The possibility of Dow zero just ticked up a standard deviation or two. What happened to the Moscow stock exchange after 1917 anyway?

The end of the stock market? Impossible, right? Well, if our Bolsheviks enact their desires to use government funds to buy all manner of securities (as the Russians are now doing), they could eventually own everything, not just the mortgage market and a huge insurer.

Buyout mania, with a twist.

If a security’s market price is $10 and the government offers $20, that is not ‘market support’, that is a buyout. Of course, there are limits to this sort of nationalization, namely the difference in scale between the Fed’s $900 billion balance sheet and the many tens of trillions of dollars in US private equity and debt instruments, so at first they will be very selective (ahem), but they do have two tools to help them work around those limits: printing presses and guns. In a few short years, when the former lose their potency, the latter can be brought to the fore.

PS — Of course, my opinion is that this rally (futures are up 2% on top of today’s dramatic close) is just a short squeeze and dead cat bounce. The air pocket under stocks just got a whole lot bigger. 90-day T-bills last traded at 0.07%. The stall warning light is still on.